Charlie Kirk on Why Most Students Should Skip College
Charlie Kirk, the late founder and CEO of Turning Point USA, built his platform by directly engaging students on campuses nationwide. His signature challenge—“Prove me wrong”—often centered on questioning the true value of higher education.
Charlie Kirk questioned college’s worth, warning of debt and limited returns as many Gen Z now share doubts about higher education’s value.
Olivier Touron/AFP via Getty Images
Kirk, who left Harper College outside Chicago before creating an $85 million nonprofit, frequently argued that students were pursuing degrees more out of routine than strategy. He emphasized that college once promised financial stability and career advancement, but that reality was slipping away for many graduates.
In a 2022 op-ed, he noted that fewer graduates were finding education to be the key to professional success. He believed that universities shifted focus away from essential skills like writing and problem-solving and toward conformity, all while increasing student debt. His approach was pragmatic: find a way to enter the workforce and then evaluate whether a degree is truly needed.
Promoting his 2022 book The College Scam: How America’s Universities Are Bankrupting and Brainwashing Away the Future of America’s Youth, Kirk pointed to what he viewed as the real gap—drive and ambition. He often asked, “What is that piece of paper really going to do for you?”
Kirk’s message resonated with many Gen Zers who question the return on investment of higher education. A recent survey by Indeed revealed that 51% of Gen Z graduates now consider their degrees a “waste of money.” Research from the Financial Times further showed that unemployment rates among male college graduates mirror those of peers without a degree.
This generational shift has contributed to over 2 million young men now classified as NEET—Not in Employment, Education, or Training—with average student debt approaching $40,000. For those seeking alternatives, Kirk encouraged entrepreneurship and self-directed paths, insisting that four-year degrees were not the only route to success.
Although his arguments were often framed ideologically, criticizing what he described as universities dominated by “far-left professors,” he did make exceptions. Kirk maintained that degrees remain essential for careers in medicine, law, engineering, or accounting. Still, he concluded that most students would be better served by skipping college altogether and finding more direct ways to pursue their ambitions.
